| 
								
                                
                                Chapter 58. RECOMMENDATION REPORT 
								
                                Advanced Methods of 
                                Recommendations --- --- 
Introduction 
These advanced ideas and/or applications can help 
you understand and use this paper's type of thinking better.  For 
additional information, check the chapter's 
                                
                                
                                
                                Grammar Book 
                                Links 
in the right column.           
           
Recommendation reports are one of the more sophisticated forms of general 
professional and business writing.  they involve step-by-step critical 
thinking.  They are, in critical thinking practice, what is called a 
"problem-solving" technique or tool.  This is because, in true 
critical-thinking fashion, they present a problem and reach a solution by first 
going through a series of logical, thoughtful steps, including
 
1. Gathering all relevant 
background data 
2. Exploring all aspects of the 
problem--causes and results 
3. Establishing a set of 
real-world criteria for examining solutions 
4. Brainstorming a number of 
solutions 
5. Applying the criteria to the 
solutions to rate the solutions 
6. Ranking the two or three best 
possible solutions 
7. Re-examining & revising a 
step before the next one 
8. Re-examining the whole and 
revising it before finishing 
9. Using the solution 
10. Evaluating its effectiveness 
and possible alternatives to it 
A shorter summary of this 
process can be called the "D.A.R.E." model: 
D.A.R.E. System 
(rev. 7-12) 
  
  
    
      | D.   | 
      Describe | 
       Describe your text (or your
        problem or need) and all its surrounding issues. |  
      | A.   | 
      Analyze | 
       Analyze your information by
        sorting it according to several possible systems. |  
      | R.   | 
      Respond/React | 
      Respond or react by offering several possible 
      pros and cons--arguments--from public, academic, or other spheres and/or 
      your own carefully weighed thoughts.. |  
      | E.   | 
      Evaluate | 
       Having collected all this data,
        evaluate which is best using a set of criteria: judge it as a legal 
      judge might, using the evidence to critique it fairly and squarely. |  (For additional discussion about using these four steps of
D.A.R.E., go to "The
Steps of D.A.R.E. in a Critical Review" in another chapter.)   
A worksheet for applying 
critical thinking skills to an academic or professional paper can be found in 
the "Critical Thinking" 
chapter. 
--- 
Return to top.    
     
 
Writing a Recommendation Letter for a Person 
A recommendation letter can be as simple as a verification that the person has 
worked for a company, or a much richer and potentially very important document 
written by a supervisor, faculty member, fellow employee, or friend to help 
someone gain employment entrance into a program.  The latter type of 
recommendation letter is especially important to write well so that the author 
of it does not "damn with faint praise" by writing about the subject of the 
letter with lukewarm assessments and a lack of significant personal detail. 
The best recommendation letters are one to two typed, single-spaced pages in 
length, written in standard professional letter format.  They are written 
using anecdotes about the subject, details of their work and/or academic record, 
a statement of whether the author of the letter would enjoy working with the 
person, and strong praise of the subject in especially important areas.  A 
good recommendation letter also often will have at least one paragraph 
discussing two or three of the subject's weaknesses; a great recommendation 
letter will explain what the subject has done or is doing to turn those 
weaknesses into strengths.   
A recommendation letter has many of the same elements as a personal statement.  
See the chapter in this textbook on "Applying 
for Jobs" for a discussion of personal statements and a sample of a well 
written personal statement. 
Writing an Analysis 
An analysis is a common type of paper in collegiate writing.  At a 
disciplinary or college-major level, it usually requires applying one or more 
theories to a specific reading, event, person, or situation.  In 
professional recommendation writing, one or more theories--or several parts of 
one theory--can be applied to a problem or need, the results analyzed, and then 
the theory or part of the theory that is most effective can be applied.  To 
learn how to write an analysis, go to the chapter in this textbook called "Analysis." 
Writing an Evaluation Paper    
Evaluative writing in an academic setting can also 
be applied to professional writing and activities.  For evaluative criteria 
and other aspects of academic evaluative writing, see well developed chapter in 
this textbook called "Evaluation." 
Writing a Critical Review    
Writing a critical review in a professional 
situation generally means reviewing one or more professional books or articles 
so that others can decide whether to read them.  The steps of thinking 
involved in a critical review include (1) summary or description of the reading, 
(2) arguments or interpretations of it by the reviewer and/or other potential 
readers, and (3) evaluation of the quality of the work and thinking in it based 
on a set of criteria.  Disciplinary/professional critical reviews are 
discussed in the chapter in this textbook called "Critical Review." Writing Evaluative Conclusions in a Business Report, Performance Review, or
System Review      The most common type of formal 
professional and business
writing (other than letters) probably is the "Professional 
Report."  Often, a professional business report simply is a step-by-step, objective
description of a system, project, or person.  However, in some situations,
a writer may be asked to provide evaluative conclusions as well.  If that
is the case, an evaluative system must be clear to both the writer and his or
her audience: if it is not obvious (or legal concerns require full reporting),
then the writer should be careful to describe what evaluative criteria are being
used.  In this kind of report, the evaluative comments may occur at the end
of each topic section, as a separate evaluative topic section at the end, or
briefly as part of the conclusion.   
A job performance review or a systems review are specific types of business
reports that require thorough evaluation.  These types of reports can be
broken into topic sections as described above.  The introduction and/or
first topic section should, however, very clearly describe the subject, the need
or purpose of the review, and the criteria that will be used.  To see more
about writing a simple business report, go to "Professional 
Report" in this textbook. 
--- 
Return to top.     
     
 
  
    | 
      | 
    Writing Theory 
    for Students: Writing an Xxxxxx |  
Important basics about critical 
thinking can be found in this textbook's chapter called "College 
Thinking." 
 
A more advanced discussion of 
critical thinking can be found in this textbook's chapter called "Critical Thinking." 
--- 
Return to top. |